BLADE RUNNER 2049 Ending & Replicant Theory Explained

Did you enjoy Blade Runner 2049 and if you did which was your favourite part?
The Hidden Meanings video isn't quite finished yet. I'll post a link here when it's uploaded!

Connected to alien 👽 franchise 👏🏻

I’ve watched a bunch of analyst videos for 2049 and this one is by far the best

Here's an idea, what if Rachel gave birth to TWO kids, a male and a female. If there was one child found, no one would look for the second.

I don't think I want a sequel tbh

Blade runner 2049 was a great movie and with deep layers ……after coming out of theater i had the same questions in mind as u have pointed out in the video…..and i have never seen a the original blade runner movie the best part of the movie is u dont have to see the original understand k and joi's story line …..which i felt like that was the heart of the movie.I felt the inner struggle of k and it made me sad when it was conformed that he is not Deckard's child…(which i had suspected ) .I still want to belive K is alive at the end of the movie ….thanx to the director for keeping it ambiguous.

I didn’t understand the whole movie. Maybe because I haven’t seen the first one. But this video made it more clear. Thanks and keep up the good work 👌🏽

Great video! I saw 2049 yesterday and I have more questions than last week after watching the original! 😂 I liked 2049, it was far more easier to follow the plot and understand what's it about than the 1st movie I guess… Seeing the 1st movie helped. But that might just be me. It was a little too long, but I liked it 🙃

I think this movie was fantastic love Gosling and as for a third movie…In short, I really want a third one because I just wanna find out how it all turns out and really how good of a movie they can make out of it.

Perhaps an interesting anecdote- the unicorn angle apparently is a reference to 'the glass menagerie' by Tennessee Williams(?) . In the conclusion to that story the glass unicorn falls and the horn breaks off making it a 'normal' horse, 'like everyone else'.

Stelline = Little Stars (in Italian)

I really enjoyed the movie, but I'm also a big fan of the original. I don't think this movie will do well with the general audience, which is a shame because I'd like to see more from the Blade Runner universe now.

Deckard is likely a hybrid, that is how he was able to reproduce with Rebecca.
It is also possible the blackout altered all their memories, and the entire story is a farce.

Great review Flicks – and great comments all.  Certainly a masterpiece worthy of profound discussion.  The story and themes touch on the underlying questions that ALL sentient beings ask, everyday, whether they realize or not – "Who Am I?" "Why Am I Here?"

The sacrifice theme of both Batty and K….Suggesting again that replicants care more about life than humans do. ….more human than human.

WHEN NIEANDER SAYS HE HAS MILLIONS OF KIDS I THINK HE MEANS IT SOME HOW ! I SEE THIS RESEMBELANCE TO THE LAWS LIKE ROE VS WADE BUT INSTEAD OF BORN IN THE USA ITS CONCEIVE . I WAS TRYING TO MAKE EYE PARTS LIKE MACULAS FOR IMPLANT . AND WATCHING THIS MOVIE GAVE ME AN EYE DEA LOL. IF I TAKE HUMANE SPERM AND BURN OFF THE SHELL LEAVING THE DNA THEN DILUTE THE MILLIONS OF DNA STRANDS WITH OOPLASM MODIFIED FROM CHICKEN EGG WHITE MIXED WITH EGG YELLOWS THEN THE DNA STRANDS WILL NOT TOUCH EACH OTHER AND EACH DNA STRAND REPLICATES AND MAKES A CELL AND DIVIDES BY PARTHOGENESIS TRYING TO FORM AN EMBRYO . IF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES ARE SENSITIZED TO EAT OFF 2 THEILIUM HORMONES THEN ONLY THE CELL LINE FOR MACULA WILL EVENTUALLY FORM . IF A MACULA GENE FROM A MANTIS SHRIMP IS VIRALY CONGUGATED OR GENETICALLY TRANSFORMED INTO THE HUMAN MACULA POSSIBLY SOME OF THE MUCULAS WILL HAVE MULTISPECTRAL VISION ABILITY . SORRY IF I GOT LOST HERE !

Blade Runner 2049 was a masterpiece

Underrepresented–or perhaps, misrepresented–is Wallace's role. He responded to the Blackout by saving as much data (or memory) as possible in vast archives. His interest in humanity is clear. He also assisted food shortage by engineering synthetic foods. Now, his interests seem to align with pre-death Tyrell to engineer a better human, one that could survive the present harshness of Earth and space, but also one that can reproduce. One might argue that Wallace wasn't acting from a God complex, but from a genuine interest in saving humanity.

Wouldn't you know it, but Joi's story is one of the most intriguing elements in the film. She was acting on her own to try to wake K while he was unconscious in the crashed police cruiser, it wasn't something K was wishing she would do. Also, her curiosity researching the DNA and setting up the Her-inspired date was her plotting–in fact K seemed reluctant. Everything K experienced after syncing her to the mobile device, she experienced (K mentions a few times that she's been listening in, or eavesdropping). Joi's not psychic, but empathic…a Wallace trait programmed into companion AIs to make them seem more human-like. But these instances of initiative and autonomy do beg the question: does Joi dream of synthetic sheep?

I enjoyed it overall. I was hoping for a few more answers to questions from the first movie. I really enjoyed the effects, acting and the music. It is a decent sequel. I wish there was a longer ending scene with Deckard and his daughter.

Great video Flicks and the City. Question, do i need to watch the first movie before i watch this one?

Who are the winners?

I loved this movie. I also loved how we didn't know anything about the movie going in. It made the twists and turns more effective and the movie was all the better for it. A worthy sequel to one of the greatest movies of all time.

The first part of the movie I was trying to figure out what was going on,the second half went so slow that when the film climaxed I was ready for it to
take off. But instead it ended abruptly with Deckard making contact through the glass barrier with his daughter. . Visually it was incredible ,mind blowing but on a story telling level it went too slow and barely gave any information about the characters, Niander Wallace, Lieutenant Joshi, Sapper Morton. I was left trying to figure out who they were and what role they played on a bigger scale in the story. I agree that the movie answered some questions from the first movie but it left a bigger gap with even more questions on top of previously unanswered questions. Is Deckard a replicant?(I know the director left it unanswered purposely but still kills me to know). How was Rachel able to give birth? How did other replicants give birth if they even did? Was every person in the movie a replicant? Was Gaff a replicant? I wish the story wasn't so ambiguous but a little more straight forward. It would have made it more interesting
and entertaining to watch. It was big undertaking by Denis Villeneuve but I think they left too many loose ends in the characters.

LUV is part of the rebellion! That's why she gets emotional because she has to do what she's programmed to do whether she wants to or not. She also does not want to arouse suspicion. She helped the daughter/memory maker get the job at wallace corp to implant her real memories into all the new replicants to make them more human right under Wallace's nose. Deckart is a replicant, all blade runners are replicants because humans don't want to get their hands dirty chasing around dangerous replicants, So they programme the replicant blade runners to do the job. LUV also helped create memory makers new/fake identity after Deckard and rebelian did the black out and scrambled all the records. She is not really sick it's just a story they made up to keep her safe in that chamber. LUV does not kill K when she had the chance when she captures Deckard, this is also part of the plan.. can't be bothered to explain anymore.