There are still pages left in this story. Watch the NEW trailer for #BladeRunner2049, in theaters October 6.
 —
Thirty years after the events of the first film, a new blade runner, LAPD Officer K (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what’s left of society into chaos. K’s discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former LAPD blade runner who has been missing for 30 years.
 
From executive producer Ridley Scott and director Denis Villeneuve, #BladeRunner2049 stars Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford, Ana De Armas, MacKenzie Davis, Sylvia Hoeks, Lennie James, Carla Juri, Robin Wright, Dave Bautista and Jared Leto.
—
Follow #BladeRunner2049 on social media:

source

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

24 COMMENTS

  2. Hello all introduce my name is Hastin Nuraini Jalan Lilin Mas 6 Dadaprejo Junrejo Batu East Java – Indonesia Tel: 62-81334887683 I love to write and have a series of short stories I want to sell a movie script for Hollywood And one day want to be a jury at the film festival greetings from Indonesi

  5. That theme music is a fucking travesty, an insult to Vangelis and the Yamaha CS-80. They spend $150 million on a film, and can't get a Cs-80 or Vangelis? They use some stupid softsynth emulator with no depth or felling like the original.

  9. This is one of the worst movies I've ever seen(besides the visuals) Please argue why I'm wrong. I'm genuinely interested because I just got back from seeing and I'm curious to know why anyone would recomend or defend this.

  16. Wow, that movie left me speechless! It's just beautiful in every possible way. I have no idea what the Marvel brainwash ministry has done to the young cinema fans of the last 10-15 years but the argumentations used in pretty much all the negative reactions are plain ridiculous and pathetic. I understand that the slow pace and its philosophical nature is not everyone's cup of tea but people must be completely out of their minds to consider this masterpiece a bad movie because it was not fast and the characters spoke a lot. Idiocracy at its best.

  19. Movies are like currency, what it meant in 1982 isn't the same as what it is in 2017. In 1982 Ridley Scott and co. imagined a (retro)future unlike any other and made such a monumental film. Over the years we have become so familiar with androids on film and fiction (Although earlier literature existed), that the original Blade Runner will not impress newer film-goers much and convert them. But as a product of its time, everything about the movie was innovative and still holds up very well, down to the effects and score. In comparison a 2017 release of a sequel doesn't have to tackle much in terms of a visual style or substance since they have already been well established. I feel in that sense, we haven't really imagined real sci-fi in years. I enjoyed 2049 since it didn't destroy what the original was or dumb it down with mere action. But I still feel the original had a momentum alongside its philosophy that the new one replaces with stares, silences and pauses. It could have been shorter and more potent.

  21. Sad film. Surprisingly the bloke that never talks can act. Amazing effects etc..but I think it's emotionally one of the saddest films I've ever seen. He's not human; his electro wife is killed & that scene where the big woman calls him "joe" devastating. The original blade runner is more action sci fi this one is romantic sci fi. Both good.

  24. Being honest I grew up watching Han Solo and Indiana jones and watching fugitive as a six year old blade runner never appealed to me however I watched the first one and did some research and even read the book to blade runner I loved it and I was worried about the sequel thinking it would be another begging Harrison to return kind of movie which he has done but this movie really is worth a watch ! I loved it! Blade runner is new to me aswell which I think was good

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here