SUPPORT THE NERDWRITER HERE AND HELP ME MAKE MORE VIDEOS:

TUMBLR: TWITTER:

Email me here: thenerdwriter@gmail.com

SOURCES:

Ethics, Aesthetics, and the Future in Alfonso Cuarón’s “Children of Men”:

THE POLITICS OF MELANCHOLY IN ALFONSO CUARÓN’S Y TU MAMÁ TAMBIÉN,
CHILDREN OF MEN AND THE POSSIBILITY OF HOPE:

The Syrian Refugee Crisis Is Our Children of Men Moment:

source

46 COMMENTS

  1. One of my favorite movies. I loved the tribute to King Crimson "In The Court of the Crimson King." There is a more subtle tribute to another great British musical group that I bet most people never spotted. When the chauffeur driven car arrives at Battersea Station (Lost art building) look up between the two right stacks. There is a giant floating pig tethered between the smoke stacks. That is a tribute to Pink Floyd "Animals" album in which Battersea Station with a giant pig floating between the stacks was the scene used as the album cover. The floating pig is seen again in the scene where they are all sitting at a large table. Just outside the window is the giant floating pig. The younger people who came after Record Albums are missing out on a lot of really cool artwork that was the hallmark of a great album.

  2. Why must the only "stable country" accept all immigrants if it is the immigrants who live in their native countries and make it unstable?

    I'm confused. Do people presuppose that every migrant is immediately "not one of the people causing instability in their home country"?

  3. So dumb. Every side in this film is a bad guy at one point or the other. and the immigrants rights group killed the leader who wanted to save the baby and mother so that they could use the mother and baby as a political tool and start a revolution, like the true leftists they are. But why include that small minor detail when you can use one tidbit of the film to criticize conservatives and Trump, like the true leftist YOU are. By the way, Britain was the last stable Government left, and immigrants from everywhere were overcrowding the police state. So imo they were doing it right, taking care of their overcrowded and dying population before immigrants. The point of the movie has nothing to do with politics, it's slightly a commentary on a society trying to survive in the wake of a global pandemic, but mainly just a film about an average Joe trying to keep a girl alive in a warzone. The video was good until this leftist idiot brought up complex social and cultural issues he doesn't understand. Stick to film theory.

  4. This movie was libtarded propaganda. the whole thing from start to finish. its like some faggot college kids wet dream. If they wanted it to be more factual the terrorist group "fishes" wouldn't be a bunch of whites with dreads and nose rings, it would be some rag tag group of goat fucking muslims running people down with lorrys, and bombing children's concerts. They portrayed the ethic whites as the oppressor, whilst anyone with a pair of working eyes can see there is a organized attack against the white nations of the world. This movie promotes that by making the lead female protagonist a non british black. That's their narrative, non whites are the future. Unfortunately for the zionists behind this propaganda piece, the internet has blown the lid off of their plot, and the whites of the world are starting to take measures to reverse what's been done, and to ensure that these wicked individuals are labeled and ejected from the land, or buried under it.

  5. no just neoconservative regimes. neoliberal too. it's general to capitalist regimes. capitalism demands incessant growth, necessitating expanding markets. when trade negotiations do not yield sufficient results (and how could they?), the only fallback is force.

  6. Yet more proof that conservatives are extremely sensitive people. Nerdwriter explains the OBVIOUS subtext of this film, conservatives intepret it as being preached to, proceed to write out how offended they are. Idiots.

  7. This is one of my favorite movies, but sometimes the story would frustrate me because it followed a man, which seemed incongruous with most of the themes. It felt very much like a "we chose a man by default" kind of story, which is such a tiring issue in film. This look at foreground/background adds a new layer on how I perceive that now. Perhaps the incongruous nature of following a man in this world is intentional, highlighting how world issues fade to the background. And the introduction of a pregnant woman snaps us out of that space. I love your analysis!

  8. Humanity is of course subject to our varied descriptions, but Jasper seemed unwilling to part with his take on it, and further to mock the "madness" IMO of his murderers behavior. Just one thought among a couple of others about the movie.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here