Eragon movie clips:
BUY THE MOVIE:
FandangoNOW –
iTunes –
Google Play –
Amazon –
Fox Movies –
Don’t miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS:
CLIP DESCRIPTION:
Saphira tells Eragon (Ed Speelers) why she chose him to be her rider.
FILM DESCRIPTION:
Industrial Light and Magic special-effects wizard Stefen Fangmeier makes the leap into the director’s chair with this coming-of-age fantasy concerning a young boy whose discovery of a mysterious dragon egg leads him on a predestined journey to become a Dragon Rider and defend his peaceful world against an evil king. Based on the best-selling novel by Christopher Paolini, Eragon tells the tale of the titular character (Ed Speleers), a humble farm boy living in the land of Alagasia, whose life is forever changed when he discovers that he has been chosen to fight the most powerful enemy his world has ever known. Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich, and Djimon Hounsou co-star in a film produced by Davis Entertainment and adapted from the novel by screenwriters Peter Buchman, Larry Konner, and Mark Rosenthal.
CREDITS:
TM & © Fox (2006)
Courtesy of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Cast: Djimon Hounsou, Ed Speleers, Sienna Guillory, Rachel Weisz
Director: Stefen Fangmeier
Producers: Roger Barton, Kevin Richard Buxbaum, Wyck Godfrey, Kevin Halloran, Gil Netter, Chris Symes, Adam Goodman, John Davis
Screenwriter: Peter Buchman
WHO ARE WE?
The MOVIECLIPS channel is the largest collection of licensed movie clips on the web. Here you will find unforgettable moments, scenes and lines from all your favorite films. Made by movie fans, for movie fans.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR MOVIE CHANNELS:
MOVIECLIPS:
ComingSoon:
Indie & Film Festivals:
Hero Central:
Extras:
Classic Trailers:
Pop-Up Trailers:
Movie News:
Movie Games:
Fandango:
Fandango FrontRunners:
HIT US UP:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Pinterest:
Tumblr:
source
I haven’t watched the movie but read the book in school and had to write about Eragons character analysis and my teacher said the movie was “disappointing” for the people who read the book
deberían sacar las otras tres
I miss this movie so much I had to see the clip and see it and I used to watch it when I was little
I’ve never heard the word “loose” used in a movie to command archers to fire, and honestly it’s another example of the pooor screenplay. In the words of Glenn Gould, “never be clever for the sake of being clever”.
''firee NOWWWW ATACK NOWWW''
SHUT UP SHUT UP
Those aren't urgals they're an insane man eating tribe
it was ok, but the battle didn´t go that way
فلم يأخذك عالم آخر
uRgALs hAVe hOrNs…
(As stated in Eldest as Orik pulls out a bow made of an Urgal horn)
I remember being in complete awe of this scene.
I love how technology has progressed. Now, we saw Daenerys Targaryen smash the Lannister army on dragonback.
Its got some hella cringy moments but this was awesome as a kid
Guy: HEY GENERAL PATTON SHOULDN'T WE SHOOT BACK OR SOMETHING?????
i would love for this movie to get a second chance shadowhunters got a second chance the movie sucked pretty bad so i would love a eragon tv sries
رررررراءع
Dracarys
Welp I watched the movie before the book but good thing I didn't remember it cause I saw it halfway. Now I'm currently yearning the last few chapters of the book that I've borrowed from a library
More cringe than twilight
So much in this movie is just flat out wrong…
God…the tactics employed.
I actually liked this movie
Hay l am turkish Mv inglish is verv good
Arya doesn't even have pointed ears smh
Cringe fest for someone who read the books
I see a bunch of people griping that "The book was better", and, having not read the book, I'm not sure about that from my personal views. But the movie was still entertaining to say the least. I enjoyed it when I saw it in theaters, and that's what I care most about.
Like SST, on its own, it is a good movie. Is it a 1-1 telling of the book? No. I've heard that the book covers a time period of a couple years while Saphira grows from hatchling to Adult, and that it takes even longer for her to breath fire. You guys do have to understand, that film-makers are sometimes pressured to get a book movie out, and may not be given the best of budgets. Of course, some of this could be down to the fact that the writer of the novel had little say in the film making process, like how Robert A. Heinlein didn't have much say in how SST was made into a film (he died almost a decade before SST hit theaters though).
It just all depends on several factors:
1. Does the studio care to stay close to the source material?
and
2. Does the IP holder have a say in how it's handled?
Case in point, the Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings films. While, again, not 1-1 retellings of their respective novels, they were still as close as practical, but that's because the studios were willing to take a chance on the IPs, and give them the money they needed to get the job done right. The CG team in charge of this film was spot on though, and made Saphira very believable. The writers may have compressed the story to fit the film, but they may have been given a target length, and they may have had to make compromises to hit that target.
At the end of the day though, there were a lot of talented people who poured their heart and soul into the film. Even if you don't like the final project, at least give credit that these guys did the best that they could.
Archers ready! Loose! Pew! Pew! Compare with Aragon and the volley in helms deep.
Our name is
Unoa
This Eragon parody is awesome !
This was an ok movie, if you wanted a fantasy/adventure movie. If you were a fan of the books, then this was terrible. Go read the books, they're so much better
Those are not Urgals! Urgals have horns and grey skin, get it right.