Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is the title of the second Fantastic Beasts film.
In this video I talk about which creatures/beasts we will see in the second Fantastic Beasts film.
Fawkes Video –
Thanks for watching!
Subscribe for more Game of Thrones Season 8, The Lord of the Rings Amazon TV Series, Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald and more epic fantasy videos!
Twitter –
Intro & Outro Music: www.bensound.com
source
Let me know what you think! Which beasts do you want to see return or debut?
New Game of Thrones Season 8 video is next so make sure you subscribe to get that.
Thanks for watching and I will see you in the comments!
I’m very happy that the Niffler & Picket are returning. They were my favourite Beasts in the first film.
I assumed that the “Chinese creature” was Claudia Kim’s unspecified character’s Maledictus, maybe Nagini? Fawkes is a great theory as well.
November 2018 can’t come soon enough.
Well, I certainly want to see BEASTS, for crying out loud , I mean HELLO? Hence the title of the series.
Last tirade:
The main problem I had with the first film was that the beasts really did distract from the overall tone and pacing and everything. The scenes involving them would lighten the tone far too much considering the story and it didn't feel natural with the rest of the story, they JUST BARELY made it feel a bit more integral to he story. But I really hope the beasts are improved upon, more organically incorporated, and show up much, much less here.
If the film takes the same piecemeal approach to the beasts like they did in the first film, outright stopping the narrative to focus on them, it will be a relative critical unsuccess and it won't be good for this story.
They play a relatively insignificant part of the first film's plot, and the fact that beasts that show up on screen for literally 5 minutes are monopolizing attention and shaping how people feel about the plot and the film overall, is dangerous.
You can't try to tell a story about a war with Grindelwald and constantly distract people from the war with Grindelwald.
Not to mention, the first film DOESN'T include a lot of Beasts scenes outside of a few notable set pieces in the first couple acts of the film, and the animals themselves aren't an active part of the plot.
They serve as a cover for the Grindelwald storyline and the hunt for the obscurus, which drives the plot of the film.
That's why the creatures really serve as nothing but distractions in the storyline. They don't mean anything. They're silly and childish.
How can you have a Fantastic Beasts film without the beasts?
The niffler will steal the show again….