John, Ben, Cenk, and Brett review the ninth episode of Game Of Thrones season 6.

Every Monday What The Flick?! offers professional, in-depth reviews of Game Of Thrones with Ben Mankiewicz, John Iadarola, Cenk Uygur, and Matt Atchity.

source

27 COMMENTS

  1. She didn't want to tell him bcos she wanted to sacrifice them to win. She is playing Ramsay game. Making Ramsay think that he is winning so he let his guard down but then at the end she swoop in and will feel entitled that cos of her that they take the north back. So when daenery and Jon come back she will be really piss and there will be conflict there

  2. All you people getting your cocks in a twist over the LOTR comment…Why are you watching a review if all you're gonna do is bitch moan and complain every time you disagree? Instead of actually taking something from the review as a whole?

  3. Does anyone even like Cenk ? His own peers don't like him because he's just ignores everything they say to jump in and interrupt them with something either so obvious or something that makes zero sense. You can see in Ben's face, everytime Cenk interrupts one of them, he puts his hand over his mouth and looks away because he wants to say something.

  4. Comparing GoT to LotR is absurd. They are 2 completely different things. Lotr is a traditional hero story. GoT is about political intrigue more then anything. Lotr is a story for everyone. GoT is not for kids.

    The comparison is sad at best. It's like comparing Star Wars and Alien(s) because they both have spaceships.

  5. I think Sansa's decision to not tell Jon and the others about the Knights Of The Vale was crucial to their victory. Think about it. If Jon HAD known about the Vale knights and factored them into his plans, there would have been no one to come to the rescue when Jon inevitably fell into whatever trap Ramsey had devised.

  6. The thing that makes GOTs GOTs is that the characters stay true to their nature. Which is why John is not the best at strategy. And the battle would not have been as epic and dramatically in depth had they done the show you guys way. And you've never been in war and only watch this shit as entertainment so you really wouldn't understand why the plots work out the way they do

  7. LOL @ 8:40 where Brett tries to explain a filmmaking technique while clearly demonstrating he has no knowledge of said filmmaking technique. The "choppy" look he is describing is not as a result of a slow frame rate, it is the result of a a faster shutter speed such as 1/120 (if shooting digital) or a smaller shutter angle such as 45 degrees (if shooting on film). A slower frame rate, such as Brett suggested, would wind up giving you a funny "fast forward" feel, like a lot of the old silent movies we see today, which were shot at slower frame rates, but look fast when played back in today's standard 24 frames per second. Conversely, slow motion is achieved by shooting at very fast frame rates (60fps, 120fps, etc) and then played back at the 24 fps standard.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here