If you’re new, Subscribe! →

At a time when it seems like every movie in history is being considered for a remake or a reboot, the horror genre has found itself particularly ripe for pillaging. Sometimes, it takes more than just one attempt to get it right. For proof, just queue up these horror remakes that actually turned out better than the original films…

The Evil Dead | 0:16
The Hills Have Eyes | 1:13
The Crazies | 1:56
Funny Games | 2:49
Silent House | 3:35
We Are What We Are | 4:18

Read more here →

Horror Movies

Underappreciated Japanese Horror Films You Need To See

Movies That Redefined The Horror Movie Genre

25 Best Horror Movies To Stream On Netflix Right Now

What Famous Horror Movie Monsters Look Like Without Their Masks

Hidden Horror Movie Details Almost No One Notices

Secret Horror Movie Endings You Never Knew Existed

Website →
Like us →
Instagram →

Looper is the go-to source for the movies, TV shows and video games we all love. We’re addicted to all things superhero and Star Wars, but we’re not afraid to binge watch some reality TV when the mood strikes. Whether it’s revealing Easter eggs and secrets hidden in your favorite films, exposing movie mistakes, highlighting the best deleted scenes, or uncovering the truth about reality TV’s strangest stars, Looper has endless entertainment for the discerning YouTube viewer.

source

36 COMMENTS

  1. Evil Dead and The Hills Have Eyes?? I have to disagree. I definitely appreciate the originals for what they are. The remake of Evil Dead was horrible. The characters, acting, and changing of the storyline made it like any other run of the mill horror movie. The Hills Have eyes remake was good but again doesn't compare to the original.

  2. This isn't about a better show. It's about a slicker show. Most often a flawed but creative show is better than a slick copycat. 
    There is something about a work that is made by a truly creative talent, even when it is flawed that makes it superior to the slick copycat. Most people want a slick product so they are blind to the original's merits.
    It would be like having American idol singers sing Lou Reed or Bob Dylan songs with the purpose of just making them 'more professional' sounding. I would still prefer the originals.

  3. The Evil Dead remake better than the original? You must be high yo. Sure the acting was a bit better but lacked everything else. It was just a gore blood filled movie. Hardly something that I'd call horror or remotely good. May be okay to watch if you're bored and need a really cheesy movie with some friends while you talk, get messed up and fuck… yup that's how good that movie is. Good enough not to take seriously at all. Best part of that remake? The credits with Bruce Campbell saying, "Groovy."

  4. 2003's Texas Chainsaw is better (in some respects, not all) than the 1974 classic imo. The Hoyts' mostly comparatively subtle performances, contrasted by an unforgettable R. Lee Ermey's eccentricity, retain the spirit of the Sawyers' insanity.

    Yet, they avoid the original's growing obnoxiously excessive (I liked Edwin Neal but he wore on me by the dinner scene). Andrew Bryniarski's Leatherface felt similarly sympathetic, misunderstood, and exploited but more visceral & intimidating.

    Gunnar Hansen's iconic brutality and the concept of different masks influencing his personality was clever but flip-flopping from homicidal to feminine to borderline-cowardly left an inconsistent end-result sometimes lacking in fear or agency.

    The remake's atmosphere (lighting, settings of sunny tans & dilapidated browns contrasted by blood reds, dark grays, deep blues, and sickening greens) conveys an almost depressing air of what at first glance seems a typical country ghost-town.

    The teens' personalities weren't much more developed overall but Jessica Biel played a plausibly grounded, likable, smart lead worth rooting for. When she severed Leatherface's hand, killed Sheriff Hoyt, and escaped with the baby, I cheered.

  5. I think the Evil Dead and the re-make are different films: one is a horror/dark comedy whilst the re-make is flat-out horror (only one funny bit, that I remember, and that was the stuff written, in ink, in the book "are you stupid? do not go any farther" etc.). I enjoy the "re-make" much more than the original, and Evil Dead 2 about the same as the re-make.

    The Hills Have Eyes is based on the true story of Alexander "Sawney" Bean [look him up in Wikipedia] and his inbred family/clan. A lot of Wes Craven movies, including A Nightmare On Elm Street, are based on true stories. If the Native American tale o the Wendigo is true then there must be a lot of them in Scotland, UK.

  6. Yes, evil dead 2013 is better than the original. The original is classic but doesn't hold up today. The filters they used made it feel more evil dead than the original, if that makes sense. Much more atmospheric and stylish than the first.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here