Jacaerys Velaryon’s death in House of the Dragon Season 3 continues to resonate with fans and cast alike. Speaking to Pop Base on X, Harry Collett reflected on Jace’s qualities as a leader, imagining what kind of king he might have become had he lived. His comments highlight Jace’s political intelligence, compassion, and people‑first approach, while also underscoring the tragedy of his loss.
Quick read
- Harry Collett says Jace was “born to be a good leader.”
- He describes Jace as smart, compassionate, and politically astute.
- Jace would have put the people of the realm first.
Jace’s qualities as a leader
Collett explained: “Jace was born to be a good leader. He’s very smart politically and very much a people person and a people pleaser, sometimes [laughs]. He would’ve thought of the people of the realm first before anything else, and he would’ve only carried on with the drama if somebody else started it. He would never start the drama unless it involved his family.” This vision of Jace emphasizes his diplomacy and restraint, qualities that would have set him apart as a ruler.
Imagining Jace and Baela’s reign
Collett added a playful note: “And we [Bethany Antonia] were saying if Jace and Baela made it to be king and queen, we’d have a live, laugh, love sign up in the castle and it would be very drama free. Which, to be fair, would probably be quite boring, so no one would ever make a show about it. But boring is safe.” The comment underscores how Jace’s reign might have been marked by stability rather than chaos — a rarity in Westeros.
Why his death matters
Collett concluded: “I think Jace would’ve made an amazing king, and it says it in the books too, and that’s why his death was very impactful.” His words highlight how Jace’s potential as a ruler makes his loss even more devastating, both for the realm and for viewers who saw him as a beacon of hope amid the war.
Add WoT as a preferred source on Google.
